Sandbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Economist, 19 Oct 2013 | Economist, 19 Oct 2013 | ||
The subtitle of this article announces, "Scientists like to think of science as self-correcting. To an alarming degree, it is not." | |||
[http://www.nature.com/news/weak-statistical-standards-implicated-in-scientific-irreproducibility-1.14131 Weak statistical standards implicated in scientific irreproducibility]<br> | [http://www.nature.com/news/weak-statistical-standards-implicated-in-scientific-irreproducibility-1.14131 Weak statistical standards implicated in scientific irreproducibility]<br> | ||
by Erika Check Hayden, ''Nature News'', 11 November 2013 | by Erika Check Hayden, ''Nature News'', 11 November 2013 | ||
Revision as of 01:48, 4 December 2013
Nuts and death
Association of nut consumption with total and cause-specific mortality
by Ying Bao, M.D., et al, New England Journal of Medicine, 369:2001-2011, 21 November, 2013
Submitted by Paul Alper
Trouble at the lab
Economist, 19 Oct 2013
The subtitle of this article announces, "Scientists like to think of science as self-correcting. To an alarming degree, it is not."
Weak statistical standards implicated in scientific irreproducibility
by Erika Check Hayden, Nature News, 11 November 2013